Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stonelake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cabayi (talk) 11:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stonelake[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 06:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish heavy metal band. I am doubtful of their notability. The article does not cite any sources at all. It has no articles on other Wikipedias. The text is not encyclopedic at all: "After a good meal, a few beers, the interest grew to once more form a project" - stuff like this does not belong in an encyclopedia. The whole biography page also reeks of copy-paste - it was most likely copied from the band's site. I did a Google search and I couldn't find anything other than the standard unreliable sites. (Results on Google) Even if there is an album review, an interview, or news about the band, they are featured on blog-like sites. Most of them also repeat the same text. And the rest of the results are just even worse as they are databases, streaming service links, social media pages, and stuff where the words are separated. I don't know if there are reliable sources in Swedish - there may be, but I don't speak the language and I can't track down print sources. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 06:00, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 06:00, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 06:00, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - at this time no trace of notability.BabbaQ (talk) 11:15, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Still unsigned thus not easily notable. desmay (talk) 05:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.