Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stone Mountain School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Aspen Education Group. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:10, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stone Mountain School[edit]

Stone Mountain School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not only is Stone Mountain School closed, it was so small, it it not consider noteable Rileychilds (talk) 13:57, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Merge Maybe it should be merged with Aspen Education Group - Rileychilds (talk) 14:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge We could justify an article: it is a sedondary school, and small size it not necessarily relevant. But considering the particular nature of the school, it probably would do better to merge it into the article on the company, which is a specialist in such schools. 'DGG (at NYPL)' (talk) 21:21, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Keep  Notability does not change when a school closes.  Nor do references go away when they become dead links.  Where is the reference that shows that the school is closed?  Unscintillating (talk) 05:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment  I've taken down my !vote since I failed to notice that the nominator also made a Merge !vote and that there is no argument for deletion.  Unscintillating (talk) 04:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.