Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stole Dimitrievski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:28, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stole Dimitrievski[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:50, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:51, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Standard case of WP:TOOSOON, looks like he may well play in an FPL soon, but has not yet, nor has he played senior international football, so fails WP:NFOOTY. Fenix down (talk) 07:23, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:57, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Macedonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the article is about a footballer that has played in a fully pro league yet or represented his country at senior level, which means it fails WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG as there isn't enough coverage in reliable sources. Mentoz86 (talk) 20:58, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.