Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stoker: Battle of the damned

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 15:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stoker: Battle of the damned[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Student film; fails WP:GNG. Doesn't seem to fall under any CSD. Ish dar ian 00:27, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Falls short of WP: GNG. Also, since there are no sources, I believe WP: CRYSTAL would apply as well. ^{Alles Klar,} Herr Kommisar 00:41, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable as per WP:NFF. --Drm310 (talk) 05:48, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no indication of notability. If only A7 applied to non-professionally-produced future films. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 20:18, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per being far TOO SOON. As the director has a trailer up, I'd be okay with this being userfied for a short while to anyone interested in adding sources if/when they actually become available. Allow in article space only when WP:NF can be met. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:42, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per not meeting the general notability guidelines at present. No issue with revisiting this topic if it ever attracts significant coverage from multiple reliable sources. Erik (talk | contribs) 14:47, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.