Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stockpile (military)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to War reserve stock. (non-admin closure) f e minist 13:41, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stockpile (military)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:DICDEF. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:33, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No different than the regular "civilian" definition of the word. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - as written, this is indeed close to WP:DICDEF. However military stockpiles are significant in operational planning, and in terms of on-going maintenance tend to be challenging where compared to civilian stockpiles (explosive ordinance needs to be kept in separate bunker well apart to avoid a chain explosion of the whole stockpile from a single accident, theft is quite a large concern). An decent encyclopedic entry on military stockpiles could be written.Icewhiz (talk) 11:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to War reserve stock for now Seraphim System ^(talk) 17:48, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to "War reserve stock" as suggested above; not notable for stub, stand alone. Kierzek (talk) 15:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.