Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stockland Bay Village

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 23:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stockland Bay Village[edit]

Violates WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. By deleting the info that violates this information, you are left with no further info than the Bateau Bay, New South Wales page. Todd661 09:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the shopping centre is indeed notable, however, if the directory-type info is removed, the subject would be given justice with a larger representation in the Bateau Bay, New South Wales article. See also WP:LOCAL Todd661 04:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, non-notable mall. MER-C 11:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Bateau Bay, New South Wales. There are still some snippets that can be merged in and the redirect will enable the information to be found. TerriersFan 18:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and clean up. There are 58 references to this shopping centre in Ebbsco's Australia-New Zealand database. However, it reads like a shopping centre directory at the moment. An alternative would be a merger with the Bateau Bay article. Capitalistroadster 03:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 03:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Capitalistroadster, or else merge as per WP:LOCAL if the keep fails. JROBBO 04:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Tentative Keep I am only voting keep because it appears as if the actual subject probably does meet notability standards. However, the article in its current form is absolutely unacceptable; paradigm example of a directory. The whole page needs to be blanked and restarted. We don't need to be linking to every single shop at all. --The Way 09:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I have cleaned it up but I still think that it would be better in the main article so the reader can find all the info in one place. TerriersFan 17:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The contents of my sock drawer are more notable. WMMartin 18:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect into the place where the shopping center is located. 38.100.34.2 23:42, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Capitalistroadster. bbx 08:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.