Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stockato

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stockato[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy general notability guidelines. Creator of the article appears to be the owner/founder of the company. May be a valid speedy deletion. Jujutacular (talk) 23:23, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jujutacular - there is nothing wrong if a creator of an article is an owner/founder of the company being covered, as it is just a technical matter. If I let an independent entity say a friend or a family member to update Stockato, would it be OK? According to the Wikipedia guidelines probably yes. What matters is not who updates a certain content, but what public references to the topic exist. In regards with Stockato there are references at the USPTO, Tradestreaming. and The Ben Gurion University of the Negev. Best, Uri K.

Further, look closely at the editing history - multiple editors edited Stockato over the past several years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kartoun (talk • contribs) 13:59, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 21:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 21:09, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as my searches found nothing better than some browser links and simply looking at the article shows the low amount of third-party coverage. SwisterTwister talk 06:45, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 11:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:53, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.