Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stimulism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:49, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Stimulism

Delete. Barely coherent, incomprehensible, non notable. Language is non-encyclopaediac. May be a hoax as dictionary definition of Stimulism is The theory of medical practice which regarded life as dependent upon stimulation, or excitation, and disease as caused by excess or deficiency in the amount of stimulation. soUmyaSch 07:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - also note that some of the language is in first person ("Due to my strive[sic] to eliminate emotions from affecting stimulism..."), so the author is in all likelihood the sole practitioner. Zetawoof^(ζ) 07:30, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Oh, I missed the fact that there appears to be an obsolete medical theory by the name. Does someone want to write up a quick stub on stimulism-the-medical-theory? If so, I'd want to keep that. Zetawoof^(ζ) 16:23, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per WP:PN. What's with the "new religion" vandalism trend? Danny Lilithborne 10:05, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. "This is a small, uncommon religion." That means non-notable. Two new religions in one day. Wonderful. Fan1967 01:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

• Note Author has left a few comments on this AfD's discussion page - Fan1967 05:12, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

• delete NN, OR, OMG! Pete.Hurd 19:44, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --MaNeMeBasat 13:34, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.