Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stewart Douglas, 22nd Earl of Morton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Earl of Morton. Liz Read! Talk! 05:18, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stewart Douglas, 22nd Earl of Morton[edit]

Stewart Douglas, 22nd Earl of Morton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Scottish landowner and nobleman who fails WP:GNG, with no claim to fame. The sources which cover the 22nd earl are either not secondary, not independent, not reliable, and/or fail to provide significant coverage. This earl also never sat in the House of Lords due to inheriting his title post-1999.

Source assessment table: prepared by User:Pilaz
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
"The Scotsman". The Scotsman. Retrieved 3 August 2023. No 1x passing mention. This obituary is about the father. Not SIGCOV. No
Mosley, Charles, ed. (2003). Burke’s Peerage, Baronetage & Knightage. Burke's Peerage. ISBN 978-0-9711966-2-9. No WP:TERTIARY source (it's a reference work), does not meet the GNG requirement of being a secondary source. Also not significant coverage, routine genealogical information (DOB, married to, children). No
"'Lady' in need of better luck". henleystandard.co.uk. Retrieved 15 July 2021. No 1x passing mention. Not SIGCOV. No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Possible redirect target: Earl of Morton. Pilaz (talk) 13:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on redirecting to Earl of Morton as proposed?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 15:15, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect Is fair. This article seems fit for deletion, as there's no real notability or aspect of interest aside from the most devoted of genealogical scholars - so a redirect is also fitting. A MINOTAUR (talk) 17:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.