Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Waterhouse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) f eminist 14:11, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Waterhouse[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unremarkable Doctor (and author) and article seems to be quite promotional. I can find few mentions of him and virtually no coverage in independent reliable sources. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:12, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bible-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:12, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:12, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. No pass of WP:Prof. Only hope is WP:GNG orWP:Author. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Comment: I am certainly picking up hits in sources of borderline reliability, such as Politicus USA (who calls Waterhouse's Strength for His People the antithesis to Carl Sagan's The Demon-Haunted World) and this book (published by Ivan R. Dee) which notes that Strength for His People is highly recommended by the National Alliance on Mental Illness. I will keep on looking. St Anselm (talk) 02:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I found little in the way of coverage of him but by all means, if it can be found, that's great. The other issue as I've noted is that the article appears to be little more than promo as well. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 02:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I sourced aspects of his career to 2 articles in daily newspapers, albeit one of them local. Quite a few of the hits in gBooks look promising.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nördic Nightfury 11:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per coverage mentioned above. St Anselm (talk) 18:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep -- per coverage above. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:41, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.