Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Suptic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 19:58, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Suptic[edit]

Steven Suptic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial, independent support. reddogsix (talk) 15:39, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR 15:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Provisional keep - There are more secondary sources on Suptic than those currently included in the article. We should determine whether or not Suptic meets the notability requirements before deleting the article. Clbsfn (talk) 05:09, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Suptic Joins Discovery Digital Networks & SourceFed Team
YouTube Millionaries: Steven Suptic And Sugar Pine 7 Pilot The "Alternative Lifestyle" Vlog Format - Tubefilter
Comment - Neither articles are in-depth, non-trivial, or WP:SECONDARY. reddogsix (talk) 15:55, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Tubefilter, which has a wikipedia article, is a reliable source of information. Clbsfn (talk) 05:27, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - It is a WP:PRIMARY article. reddogsix (talk) 15:56, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.