Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven R. Donziger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mackensen (talk) 11:37, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Steven R. Donziger[edit]

Steven R. Donziger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This guy has no noteability whatosever outside of the Lago Agrio oilfield case, and the thing is mostly a puff piece that has had perpetual NPOV issues. Should be deleted or redirected to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lago_Agrio_oil_field . Jtrainor (talk) 02:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:17, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:17, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ecuador-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:17, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:48, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:12, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 14:27, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - As per nom. This lawyer did what lawyers do, represented a client, albeit in an important case. Other than this he is non-notable. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.