Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Prince

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 22:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Prince[edit]

Steven Prince (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unrelaible sources that do not even give roles for the subject so fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk   17:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It's a mess of a page that's better off deleted. It was originally a redirect and probably should've stayed that way. 2603:6080:5D00:2562:25F9:8413:5686:472A (talk) 21:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see what "mess" you're talking about or may be "dunno". In any case, watch your words dear editor! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, I'll reword my statement. "Subject isn't noteworthy enough for an article and sources aren't reliable." 2603:6080:5D00:2562:25F9:8413:5686:472A (talk) 15:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.