Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Griffith (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 19:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Steven Griffith[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Steven Griffith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find coverage for Griffith as an actor, and only a small bit of coverage as a playwright.[1][2].
An editor had added this article to a proposed deletion category rather than adding the prod template, and I now realise that the editor has identified as Griffith, see User talk:Colleyhampton. As he seems to be requesting deletion (and has asked about this on his talk page before), I think we should respect this wish. Fences&Windows 22:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 22:54, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete My understanding is that if someone is on the edge of notability but thesubject prefers not to be included, we defer to that wish. I'm not even convinced this person is close enough to be notable, but they certainly aren't so notable that we would ignore their wishes.--SPhilbrickT 22:22, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:42, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not a very notable actor per WP:ENT, as I don't see "significant roles in multiple notable films," etc. IMDb lists him 66th in credit order for Forrest Gump.[3]. --Glenfarclas (talk) 03:52, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.