Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven De Lelie
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus to delete. W.marsh 23:52, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Steven De Lelie[edit]
Article was qualified for speedy deletion under A7, but doesn't qualify, because the notability of this actor is asserted in the plays and in the award(s?). I'm sending it to AfD instead. No opinion. Aecis Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 23:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Non notable actor. scope_creep 23:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete possible A7, definite delete. Guy 23:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.Also, we might want to take a look at Grietje Vanderheijden, which was the other article created by the same account: User:Eveliendorien. --Brad Beattie (talk) 23:40, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Please note that the nom had no opinion, so deleting per nom would in this case be a contradiction in terms. Aecis Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 23:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- My bad. I admit to being a little hasty on the draw there. I do believe there's a conflic of interest here considering the original contributer to the article created this and another page. Outside of that, there are no contributions. A google search shows 224 hits suggesting a certain lack of notability. --Brad Beattie (talk) 00:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- As a Dutchman, I come across many of her programs on Belgian tv. They are sometimes aired on Dutch tv as well (e.g. Spoed). I can assert that Grietje Vanderheijden is notable, although the article about her needs an awful lot of work. Aecis Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 13:17, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- My bad. I admit to being a little hasty on the draw there. I do believe there's a conflic of interest here considering the original contributer to the article created this and another page. Outside of that, there are no contributions. A google search shows 224 hits suggesting a certain lack of notability. --Brad Beattie (talk) 00:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Please note that the nom had no opinion, so deleting per nom would in this case be a contradiction in terms. Aecis Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 23:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The facts in the article and the reviews cited as references establish notability. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 23:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep-as per TruthbringerToronto. Nileena joseph (Talk|Contribs) 19:02, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.