Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Crouter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Joann e B 12:21, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Crouter[edit]

Non-notable Canadian YUL89YYZ 13:17, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Kukini 13:19, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --grafikm_fr 13:37, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sounds like vanity to me. James Kendall [talk] 13:59, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as vanity. Another Laurentian University NN wannabe politico -- with three so far now, I have this uncomfortable feeling that there are several more out there. Actually, the article missed a trick in omitting the author's website; his page describing the creation of his personal flag will brighten your morning. [1] RGTraynor 14:17, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- This guy is not notable. Also, former cadets are not "retired servicemen" in the Canadian Forces. --rehpotsirhc 14:26, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn-bio. --Ter e nc e Ong 14:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vanity although we might want to save it for BJAODN as well ... I have to chuckle at the idea of a 24-year-old kid trying to fast-track himself into politics by proudly calling himself "Master Corporal X, Ret." Only "Private X, ret." could bottom that (And as if any ex-servicepeople, anywhere, are truly retired in their 20s ... if you really are, it's probably not because of your distinguished service, rather the opposite in fact). Daniel Case 15:56, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn Funky Monkey (talk) 19:10, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Wstaffor 02:04, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
My name is Steven Crouter (the real one), and I did not ask for, nor authorize this page. If it is at all possible, I ask that it be removed as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CrouterS (talk • contribs)
Delete as hoax or attack page or vandalism. --Metropolitan90 03:20, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ardenn 03:29, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Samaritan 07:23, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.