Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Ching

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Ching[edit]

failed political candidate; no references; non-notable Primal (talk) 23:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. —Primal (talk) 23:38, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:15, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nominator. RayAYang (talk) 01:51, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no basis for notability within WP:BIO. dramatic (talk) 02:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no assertion or evidence that he meets WP:BIO's notability standards. --Stormie (talk) 05:10, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above. Raymond "Giggs" K o 09:36, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is some evidence for notability around a political scandal: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], and from an ethnic/political perspective: [6]. However this coverage seems to have the nature of passing news. The scandal might be notable, but the subject isn't. Ryan Paddy (talk) 20:30, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per above, sourcing issues, and no unsourced articles on people, please. rootology (T) 14:53, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.