Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Waywell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Steve Waywell[edit]
- Steve Waywell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
never played for or managed a professional club, therefore fails WP:ATHLETE requirement ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 16:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:ATHLETE failure. пﮟოьεԻ 57 16:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I think it's been a little quickly judged here. If those websites like BBC and others are used, citations are collected from those news sites. Well I see enough information on the web for Waywell to actually pass on the WP:BIO side of things. Govvy (talk) 20:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, plenty of mentions to pass WP:BIO rather than WP:ATHLETE. - fchd (talk) 22:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. He certainly fails WP:ATHLETE, no doubt about that. And whilst there may be a bit of news coverage, what I've found so far only seems to be of the bog standard someone-commenting-on-something variety. He hasn't really done anything of note in the world of football (or any other world for that matter) for him to pass WP:N. Bettia (rawr!) 11:41, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 22:12, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per fhcd. WikiGull (talk)
- Comment Waywell's sole notability according to the article is as a football manager. The article must therefore stand or fall according to sports-related criteria. If one deleted all the football material, ther would be virtually nothign left, so that judging him according to general bio-criteria will not do. Apart from football he is clearly NN, I do not know enough of football to comment on that, so No vote. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:54, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —Peterkingiron (talk) 18:59, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability not established. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:23, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-notable manager coaching a non-notable club. Hubschrauber729 (talk) 03:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 19:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.