Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Venright

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:14, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Steve Venright

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Steve Venright (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-advertorialized WP:BLP of a writer, not supported by any strong evidence of reliable source coverage in real media and not making any particularly strong claim to passing WP:AUTHOR. The notability claims here boil down to that he and his work exist, nothing is footnoted at all, and even the external links are 3/4 primary sources that aren't support for notability -- and while the fourth link is a review of his poetry in a literary journal, one review isn't enough coverage to get an author over WP:GNG all by itself. Bearcat (talk) 04:27, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 04:27, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 04:27, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. J947 ^(c), at 04:57, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

• Delete The sole good source I could find was this one on BBC Mundo. SIGCOV might be out there, but based on my search I did not see it.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:10, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.