Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Lough

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:04, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Lough[edit]

Steve Lough (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a person notable primarily as an as yet non-winning candidate in a forthcoming political party primary. As always, being a candidate in a primary is not grounds for a Wikipedia article in and of itself -- if you cannot demonstrate and properly source a credible claim that he was already notable enough for an article for some other reason, then he has to win the general election in November, not just run as a candidate, to be notable as a politician, and the fact that his candidacy occasioned a small blip of WP:BLP1E coverage, just because of the amusing juxtaposition with his previous occupation, is not in and of itself to make him permanently more notable than the norm among non-winning candidates. No prejudice against recreation in November if he wins the seat, but nothing here entitles him to already have an article today. Bearcat (talk) 19:13, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 19:14, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete candidates do not get default notability, and nothing else suggests notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:33, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete- What is so notable about a clown running for congress? Last I checked, we already have 435 clowns in congress.--Rusf10 (talk) 02:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.