Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Fezzik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Fezzik[edit]

most of the material is unsourced and reads like marketing material. steve fezzik prefers to remain anonymous. Association of a real name with this virtual identity is conjecture and is unproven Pc360 02:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete strange and nn. unverifyible --Musaabdulrashid 03:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Fezzik appears to be vaguely notable in the world of Las Vegas sports betting. "Steve Fezzik" gets 153 unique Ghits, and has apparently had articles at least mentioning him in the LA Times, Cigar Afficianado, and other places. --Brianyoumans 03:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Looking over the article's history, and considering the fact that the article was AFDed by a single-edit user, I suspect that what is going on here is that Fezzik has decided to nominate his own article for deletion because he doesn't want a public link to his real name, Steve Fenic, which someone keeps putting into the article. (Well - probable real name - there isn't a direct connection, but it does seem likely.) Probably a statement saying his real name is "Steve Fenic" should be in the article if kept, if nothing else because he seems to want to keep it a big secret. --Brianyoumans 03:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Have no bloody idea what the article is about, and apparently it cannot establish notability. Lost Knob 03:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Hardly seems notable at all. The fact that he is known amongst a small circle of Vegas gambling fetishists does not seem like a valid reason to give him an encyclopedia article. Serpent-A 03:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I sort of gathered he was some sort of gambler, but odds are this article will be deleted, as it should be. Buckner 1986 05:55, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete subject doesn't meet WP:BIO.--Isotope23 15:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable person; dont know who it is. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 21:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. RFerreira 20:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.