Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Cash (Youtuber, Musician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. —Ganesha811 (talk) 04:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Cash (Youtuber, Musician)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable YouTuber or musician. Fails WP:GNG with not enough significant, in-depth, secondary source coverage. Different title needed if kept as well, but I believe should be deleted. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, United States of America, California, and Idaho. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this is the second AFD nomination for this person: please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Cash (YouTuber). Unclear to me whether this is eligible for speedy deletion WP:CSD#G4. Wikishovel (talk) 20:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Internet. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I read the original AFD nomination, and I can understand if this gets deleted, since most articles on him are related to his death. Although I'm not entirely sure about Paul's point about "not enough significant coverage," as there are plenty of popular news channels that reported on him. He also owns a fairly popular YouTube channel with millions of subscribers and almost a billion collective views, so I think that he could honestly pass as notable enough for Wikipedia. XanderK09 (talk) 21:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Notability is not fame nor importance. That idea rightly failed in 2004. Uncle G (talk) 22:45, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    OH makes sense, thanks! XanderK09 (talk) 23:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete his only reliable coverage was about his death. Nothing before about him or his channel. Esolo5002 (talk) 21:47, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Esolo Mach61 (talk) 22:26, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: People mag is the only RS used per source tool, and reports of his death are in the usual celebrity magazines/sites, none of which are RS. New York Post is about the most mainstream press one I can find and it's not a RS either. Oaktree b (talk) 22:46, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: One decent RS here in the NY Daily News [1], not enough. Oaktree b (talk) 22:50, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: alright yeah after reviewing all the comments i'm open to deleting this XanderK09 (talk) 23:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't satisfy notability. MaskedSinger (talk) 10:53, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing has changed regarding notability since the first AfD, and this newer version of the article is probably an attempt to get around community consensus via the desperate trick of a new page title. His death got a little media coverage, his lifetime YouTube pursuits got even less. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 20:27, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.