Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve (Minecraft)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Minecraft. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:59, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Steve (Minecraft)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet GNG. – DarkGlow (✉) 16:03, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow (✉) 16:03, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow (✉) 16:03, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is a draft at Draft:Steve_(Minecraft) and linked discussion at WPVG here. The page recreation should have just been reverted instead of an AfD. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 16:12, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment reply I saw the discussion, and when I saw the article was recreated, I thought it was best to sort this through an AfD, since the notability of the subject has already been disputed. – – DarkGlow (✉) 17:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per link above. There’s been extensive discussion and existing consensus that this article doesn’t have independent notability, per WP:NOTINHERITED. Sergecross73 msg me 16:19, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above discussion links. --Masem (t) 16:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect I'm fine with AFD settling the discussion of notability on this topic. Per the linked discussion and the nom, the subject does not meet GNG, and there's little direct commentary on the character. -- ferret (talk) 16:58, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect seems to lack notability as a character separate from the game. A redirect is perfectly fine though. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:02, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Agree with the statements above. SWinxy (talk) 20:06, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Minecraft appears most appropriate in this instance per WP:NOTINHERITED]. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 07:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Minecraft per above. Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 10:34, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as per previous discussions. Jontesta (talk) 20:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, and perhaps WP:SALT to prevent recreation. Haleth (talk) 16:31, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per WP:GNG concerns. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:41, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above. IceWelder [✉] 12:54, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.