Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Zhang (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 09:09, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Zhang[edit]

Stephen Zhang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Works for a viral marketing company. One of their videos got some media coverage [1] Insufficient notability for this individual though. maclean (talk) 19:52, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete-looks like it was previously deleted. Wgolf (talk) 20:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can't see the deleted content but from the AfD description I'm pretty sure it was about a different person. maclean (talk) 20:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Different Zhang, I peeked at the deleted content, author vs. businessperson, 23-year difference in birth year etc.. Hope this helps. --j⚛e deckertalk 00:35, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:32, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Neither has described Stephen Zhang, it requires more details and more focus, then he would be considered notable. Noteswork (talk) 05:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.