Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Mitchell (journalist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Theo polisme 23:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Mitchell (journalist)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is the subject sufficiently of note (notable) independently in his own right, or is redirection to another article a better way? -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- KC9TV 02:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 14. Snotbot t • c » 02:31, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Head of news at the BBC sounds notable to me. And as a note to the nominator, a handful of delsort categories are fine. You've added far too many, some of which don't seem at all relevant (sexuality and gender-related? Why? UK is fine; England and Scotland are not required as well, etc). -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:19, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable subject that certainly passes WP:GNG. TBr and ley 19:49, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep [1] shows that he has risen to the higher ranks of BBC management and is thus notable. Unfortunately, the article at present provides little detail of his career. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:52, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.