Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Lynch (English cricketer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to List of Buckinghamshire County Cricket Club List A players. Daniel (talk) 13:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Lynch (English cricketer)[edit]

Stephen Lynch (English cricketer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, nothing in coverage. Störm (talk) 13:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Moderately interesting that he seems to have played in minor counties until he was 50, but still not notable. RobinCarmody (talk) 21:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - passes WP:CRIN by virtue of having played a List A match. Coverage is on CricInfo. GNG isn't a relevant consideration. DevaCat1 (talk) 12:43, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • DevaCat1, please be aware that we very recently had an RfC which changed this[1]. In the past, meeting the GNG or an SNG like NCRIC was sufficient; now, it is written down more clearly that the SNG only gives a presumption that the GNG is met, but that articles meeting an SNG may still be deleted or merged if sufficient coverage can't be found. Stating that "GNG isn't a relevant consideration" isn't correct. Fram (talk) 13:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unless indepth coverage can be found. Fram (talk) 13:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to List of Buckinghamshire County Cricket Club List A players Has played 1 List-A game, but no coverage. Using similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY where players with 1 or a few games but with no coverage, are deleted/redirected. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I can't support a redirect of an unsourced article without a reference. SportingFlyer T·C 23:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.