Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Johns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Johns[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable amateur player who has yet to play professionally so fails to meet WP:ATHLETE or WP:N. Also fails WP:HOCKEY's guidelines for player notablity WP:HOCKEY/PPF#NOTE. Can be recreated when/if he plays professionally or otherwise achieves notability. Pparazorback (talk) 02:17, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. —Pparazorback (talk) 02:26, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Meets neither the GNG nor WP:NHOCKEY. Ravenswing 04:17, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails the sports criteria. Shadowjams (talk) 09:39, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY. Can be recreated when/if he ever plays professionally or otherwise achieves notability. -DJSasso (talk) 11:15, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per earlier comments, very non-notable. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 14:36, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Young player who hasn't lived to achieve notability.scope_creep (talk) 18:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.