Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Skabo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 00:16, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie Skabo[edit]

Stephanie Skabo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

GNG fail. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:40, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:41, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:41, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:41, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:41, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I tried but didn't find any in-depth reliably-published stories on her, inclusion in permanent collections of notable museums, etc., that would allow her to pass WP:ARTIST. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I agree, I also looked and couldn't find anything authoritative in Norwegian, as she supposedly was in gallery in Oslo. Markvs88 (talk) 01:48, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as I also couldn't find sufficient WP:RS to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:Artist. Most of the shows are at Galleri A in Oslo, which is not sufficient. --Theredproject (talk) 10:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, a large proportion is a direct copy from Skabo's website. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:18, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It would seem like we are headed for delete, so that problem will likely be taken care of shortly...! ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.