Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stegman's Soccer Club

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Minneapolis City SC. MBisanz talk 01:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stegman's Soccer Club[edit]

Stegman's Soccer Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable amateur soccer club. No significant coverage in reliable sources. Google and News search only turned up two short mentions. First was a few sentences in an article about Minneapolis City SC. [1]. Second only mentions name because Minneapolis City SC played under the name for unknown reasons. [2] Some content could be merged to Minneapolis City SC. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 15:04, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:06, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:06, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 15:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I dont think a redirect to MASL is the way to go. Minneapolis SC is a much better choice. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 15:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Looks like merge is the best outcome but no real agreement yet on a clear target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 22:20, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, gidonb (talk) 01:52, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.