Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steg G

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Davewild (talk) 07:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Steg G[edit]

Steg G (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He exists and performs, but I couldn't establish that he meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Created by WP:SPA; I suspect it is promotional. Tagged by Fabrictramp. Tagged for notability for 7 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 12:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:02, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep- I have added some more information and references that should address the concerns expressed above. He does appear to have been a pioneer in the Scottish hip-hop scene. As well as being a recording artist the subject of this article has also been significantly active with a community development role. His various activities have led to coverage appearing in several newspapers as well as a book and a TV programme. Drchriswilliams (talk) 19:33, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:48, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.