Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefani Morgan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 23:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stefani Morgan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Scene awards no longer count. Interviews are primary not secondary sources so fails gng and pornbio Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No qualifying awards, just nominations and scene-related wins. Negligible independent reliable sourcing. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 18:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Vivid_Entertainment#List of Vivid Girls - Note: I have recently edited the article in question here. While Debbie Does Dallas ... Again may have been "an iconic or blockbuster feature", there does not appear to be enough other notability for the subject under consideration here at this time. Guy1890 (talk) 08:24, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unfortunately looks don't count towards notability ...., Anyway she fails PORNBIO & GNG so delete, (Personally don't see much point in redirecting but guess that's up to the closer.) –Davey2010^Talk 00:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and also redirect if needed as if she was best known for that, there may not be enough for a solidly acceptable article yet. SwisterTwister talk 01:09, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.