Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefan Mychajliw (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan Mychajliw[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Second nomination of recreated bio. Essentially the same reason: county-level functionary with no other notability. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:21, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 20:01, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 20:01, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Michig or Bearcat could an admin check the deleted copy from 2014 against the current revisions to see if they suitably different? thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 20:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. It's different enough in form that this wouldn't be speediable as a recreation of deleted content, though there's obviously no appreciable difference in the strength of the base notability claim. Bearcat (talk) 20:36, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. County comptrollers are not automatically accepted as notable just because they exist, but this features neither the sourcing nor the substance necessary to make him more notable than the norm for a generally non-notable level of political office — five of the seven footnotes are to sources that do not support notability, such as primary sources and raw tables of election results — and the two that actually represent media coverage are purely local media coverage of the type that's merely expected to exist for all local officeholders, so it does not represent enough media coverage to hand him a WP:GNG pass in lieu of failing NPOL. Bearcat (talk) 20:40, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 02:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.