Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefan Behrens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.

Editors have had two weeks now to improve this article or bring in new sources which hasn't happened. Liz Read! Talk! 06:06, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan Behrens[edit]

Stefan Behrens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBASIC and GNG. Unable to find significant coverage across independent, reliable, sources via a BEFORE search. Rotten Tomatoes is not in-depth coverage, fails GNG. Tails Wx 14:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Germany. Tails Wx 14:52, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I see that there aren't many sources and documentation about him, but still he got articles in 5 other languages and contributed to a somewhat big number of films ([1]). I could therefore add a fimography part to his article and/or help translate the german article. Nyraxis (talk) 16:35, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:11, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: The German wiki article only uses imdb and another site I'm not familiar with (but just has a list of films and a small blurb as a bio). Unless we can locate own-language sources, it should be deleted for lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 14:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.