Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steelhaven

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 August 30.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus (default to keep). Valid arguments both ways -- neither seems stronger than another. — GorillaWarfare ^talk 01:14, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Steelhaven[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

De-prodded with the summary "significant fanbase". Unsourced article which consists of nothing but plot summary, about a fictional spacecraft that does not appear to have any independent notability. Black Kite (t) (c) 22:26, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The Transformers is unquestionably notable. This article meets the for inclusion as listed at Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) as an article for elements within a notable fictional work. Inniverse (talk) 01:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
or Merge into List of Tranformers spacecraft Inniverse (talk) 02:09, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The same challenge for proof of this unsupported, bare, boilerplate text, assertion is given as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Velocitron. Prove your argument with cited sources. Uncle G (talk) 02:15, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- this is even more trivial and non-notable than the other minor Transformers location articles up for deletion. No coverage in reliable secondary sources, and the article is just one long, crufty, unsourced plot summary. Reyk _YO! 07:54, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to ~~List of Transformers planets~~, where it does not yet appear to be listed. Jclemens (talk) 19:09, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- How about we try to merge this and some other articles into List of Tranformers spacecraft instead? Jclemens (talk) 17:29, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is trivial in the extream.Slatersteven (talk) 15:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for {{rescue}} by the Article Rescue Squadron, with no explanation as to why this article should be rescued and how that could happen (per ARS instructions). SnottyWong ^babble 18:02, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as super-trivial fancruft. SnottyWong ^babble 18:02, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The guideline article Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supports the notion that this article should be merged (not deleted). Inniverse (talk) 13:40, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Note that List of Transformers spacecraft is a bare list created by User:Inniverse after this AfD began, presumably in order to avoid deletion once the AfD began to lean that way. Black Kite (t) (c) 14:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The List of Transformers spacecraft was created at the suggestion of Jclemens above because, according to policy, the right thing to do is to merge articles like this into such an article - so it was created to facilitate that action. The "List of Transformers spacecraft" article is needed in any event. Inniverse (talk) 03:18, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the spacecrafts list 92.17.22.20 (talk) 09:56, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good article under construction. No need to rush to deletion. Mathewignash (talk) 12:34, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article is entirely unverified and no sources are presented in this discussion.--Pink Bull 14:33, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the spacecraft list, or merge if someone's willing to change it into a proper content list rather than just names. Alzarian16 (talk) 18:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Transformers spacecraft, not just a redirect, but as Alzarian16 says, a proper content list. Dream Focus 23:22, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.