Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steelers–Ravens rivalry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 00:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Steelers–Ravens rivalry[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one rarther poor refs to justify it being a notable rivalry. BUC (talk) 16:40, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are many rivalry articles such as the yankees-red sox and michigan-ohio st. ones. No reason to delete this page. Str8cash (talk) 23:24, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nota bene: [1] --87.79.143.161 (talk) 00:11, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Str8cash may be someone's sockpuppet, but he is correct. The article can still be improved and does not need to be deleted. — BQZip01 — ^talk 01:55, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not a sockpuppet lol, where'd that come from? Str8cash (talk) 06:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently the IP after your response believes you are + the fact that you started your contributions at AFD with aknowledge simply much higher than most starters, I don't think it is a stretch to say you've been to Wikipedia before (perhaps under an IP address? another name?). To be honest, as long as you aren't banned/indef blocked/doing a good hand/bad hand account swap, I really could care less. And that's my point: your POV is accurate and you aren't being disruptive. — BQZip01 — ^talk 20:18, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh alright, i understand. Every once in a while i come to the Afd page to help out, i didn't mean to do anything wrong as the IP Address person says, haha.Str8cash (talk) 03:53, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is one of football's best and most notable rivalries. ~ Richmond96 t • c 02:01, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep: Any divisional rivalry is notable Purplebackpack89 ^{(Notes Taken) (Locker)} 06:51, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article can use better sources? Why not simply tag the article? A lack of something so readily available is no reason to nominate for delete... its a reason to improve the article. Some of the availabe souces include AFC North, USA Today, LA Times, KTVU, Baltimore Sun, ESPN, Denver Post, and a few others. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:42, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep: This is a legitimate rivalry and a legitimate topic for WP coverage. I agree that the article itself could be improved, but that's no reason to delete it.— DeeJayK (talk) 16:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.