Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stay Moore: The World of Donald Harrington

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:53, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stay Moore: The World of Donald Harrington[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film BOVINEBOY2008 02:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:12, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:12, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this is not to be released until November 25 and does not have enough coverage of its production to meet WP:NFF. This one is simply TOO SOON. Okay with a reasonable redirect to article on Donald Harington (where it has a sourced mention) until such time (if ever) that this film gains wider coverage in reliable sources. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 09:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:36, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I find no indication that this film is, or is likely to be soon, independently notable. Also note that the current title of this article has two misspelled words.--Arxiloxos (talk) 05:19, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I had noticed the new contributor's error, but did not wish to move to a proper spelling while an AFDwas in progress. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 09:55, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

proper title:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 00:08, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.