Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stax Inc. (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:44, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stax Inc.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, couldn't find any references that weren't press releases. Nothing much changed since previous deletion Bhny (talk) 03:31, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 07:01, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Previous AfD deletion was in August 2007; a WP:SPA recreated the article just over a year later. The BusinessWeek standard company overview confirms existence; nothing found to demonstrate WP:CORPDEPTH notability though. AllyD (talk) 09:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Salt: It wasn't notable in 2007, it's not notable today. Since SPAs keep popping up to create these blatantly promotional articles, let's just ensure they can't, any more. Ravenswing 21:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.