The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 20:26, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. User:Yy-bo 20:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I don't even think this is a particularly notable deck type. Irongargoyle 23:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
