Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stats Camp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 12:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stats Camp[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a promo piece for what appears a worthy project but fails inclusion criteria for this encyclopedia. CSD tag was challenged and PROD tag will be likely as well, so posting here for discussion —Gaff ^ταλκ 21:46, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 22:35, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an advert that lacks sources entirely. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:28, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I tried several Google searches, but the only useful source I found was an article in the Lawrence Journal-World. One article in a local paper isn't enough to meet WP:GNG, so Delete unless further significant coverage in independent reliable sources is uncovered. Qwfp (talk) 16:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Sadly, the article is of no encyclopedic importance. The extent of WP:ADVERTISEMENT is too obvious to ignore. Wikicology (talk) 21:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:RS, WP:NOTE, WP:COI, WP:GNG. non-sourced article about a summer course (or bundle thereof) at a college? that's not notable. neither are any of the summer band camps and basketball camps colleges host. oh, it is for adults? well, adult lifelong learning summer courses are not notable. nor are college summer terms --even classes for grad students. this is just a bunch of themed classes for adults. all that makes it something "different" is that it has a snappy logo. that's it. merge some of the content to the texas tech article and delete this non-notable advert. since the original writer has only written about this and about the non-notable professor who teaches it, there's a prima facie case for WP:COI. this article looks like a prop to try to make the non-notable teacher, Todd D. Little somehow noteworthy. this article's original writer first wrote the Todd D. Little article and then write the Stats Camp article --and then was kept busy removing delete-requests. this article is a sort of extension of the likely WP:AUTO seemingly happening at the Todd D. Little article --which should be deleted too. Cramyourspam (talk) 14:35, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.