Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stathis Psaltis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Weak consensus, but no other editor opted for deletion after two relists. (non-admin closure) f e minist 01:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stathis Psaltis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. Only third-party source is an AP blurb about his recent death. Article is a decade old and has never been improved. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 22:25, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Sourcing potentialis there, in obits if nowhere else. Verily, most of it is Greek to me. Dloh cierekim 09:31, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:09, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's not really about potential when there's no notable coverage out there of the subject, and death alone does not establish notability. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 04:42, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The coverage us there, I just can't read it. And obits often make good sources because they are concise. Dloh cierekim 04:45, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thin argument, in all honesty. Viable English-language subject coverage -- of which there is none -- is needed for the English-language article, and obits don't suddenly make a subject notable. That is the point I am trying to get across. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 02:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've added two English language sources, there are more. Obituaries do establish notability, that is well-established. Passes WP:GNG. As so often at AfD, WP:BEFORE applies. Edwardx (talk) 19:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Once again, obits alone do not establish notability. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 21:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^(c)}} 00:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.