Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/State Drinks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 20:15, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

State Drinks[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company State Drinks does not have sufficient notability to justify its own page. Per WP:ORGCRITE, an organization or company needs to have significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources. A search for State Drinks only shows the Wikipedia page and a LinkedIn page. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 14:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:47, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article on an energy drink brand, describing its origin and listing brand ambassadors, but without content indicating encyclopaedic notability. Such coverage as I can find mentions the drink firm in relation to famous investors, but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 10:54, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.