Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starshipit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Starshipit[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable company MurielMary (talk) 11:54, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and per WP:NOTFORPROMOTION. —Unforgettableid (talk) 15:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, PR --Devokewater @ 15:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 17:06, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 17:06, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet WP:GNG but unsurprisingly this got deprodded by an WP:SPA who ~~wrote~~ has edited that article for pay. Schwede 66 19:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Schwede66: Please re-check the article’s history and the contribution’s history of User:TCM579. The article was created by another account in 2014 and there’s no reason to suggest they might be connected. Moreover, while it’s true TCM579 did de-prod the article (which pretty much anyone can do per WP:DEPROD), they have made only three edits to the article (none of which seem to have been done in bad faith or were disruptive) and they have made an effort to try and comply with both WP:UN and WP:PAID. It seems that TCM579 is, at least so far, trying to do things in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines as much as possible. — Marchjuly (talk) 22:20, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping. Yes, upon checking the history, TCM7579's contribution has been rather minor and most importantly, that user did not create the article. Have edited my rationale above accordingly. Schwede 66 00:22, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing notable about this company. Article appears promotional. Ajf773 (talk) 09:14, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. what is even here to discuss? Light2021 (talk) 01:24, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NCORP and WP:SIGCOV. There's two sources, one a blog and one "lifestyle" article'. What gives? Bearian (talk) 16:26, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.