Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StarsUnfolded

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

StarsUnfolded[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This website has questionable notability. TopCipher 07:54, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

StarsUnfolded is biography a website.This website provide biography information as of Actress, Actor,Cricketer, Businessman .etc .This is not available reliable source of website . Enaya Afzal.....📝 (Talk) 08:10, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as A7: No indication of passing WP:GNG. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:12, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Agree TopCipher (talk) 11:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:WEB as well as the general notability guideline. Zero coverage in reliable sources, no indication of notability. --Joshualouie711^talk 16:51, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
While WP:NMEDIA is a supplement to the notability guideline, starsunfolded.com's work is frequently cited by other highly reliable sources.[1][2][3][4][5][6]. One could therefore consider the subject's worth in the context of NMEDIA, which suggests that a media publication may be considered notable if its work is frequently cited by other reliable sources. Lourdes 13:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:55, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.