Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starport: Galactic Empires

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, with no prejudice toward recreation. Sr 13 20:18, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Starport: Galactic Empires[edit]

Delete - No assertions of notability, no reliable secondary sources to allow any verification and the article is 99% game guide material. DarkSaber2k 13:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. DarkSaber2k 13:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; regardless of outcome everything from the 'Gameplay' section downwards should be scrapped per WP:NOT indiscriminate information. As for sources, best I can come up with is [1], which appears to be a a fairly-written but user-submitted review. The usual bevy of download sites. Marasmusine 13:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Looking round that review and the site it's on, I'm 100% confident in saying it is a blog review, not a reliable source. I agree that, for once, it's a well-written user review, but I'd say it's a user review none-the-less. It does actualy look to be a proper review, but on it's own it's just not a big enough something. DarkSaber2k 17:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Even if it does meet the notability requirements, this is still not a proper Wikipedia article, it's more like an infodump with traces of a game guide. Also, a few recent patches upset a whole lot of people who have now taken to trolling the game forums, so its future is (IMO) at best, uncertain. I'm a former SGE player, by the way. Cctoide 14:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in the absence of sources to establish its notability, and if it does remain, I agree the gameplay guide stuff needs to go. — brighterorange (talk) 23:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My Position: keep whatever parts of this article that references can be found for, delete anything else.Repaxan 23:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.