Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starkman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 02:21, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Starkman[edit]

Probably hoax, can't verify any of the claims here. It is also a dicdef. Peyna 18:39, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom., also possibly attack since the only refs. I can find are for a last name. Mak emi 19:30, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per both above. Fightindaman 20:52, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable, unverifiable neologism, i.e. protologism. Stifle 01:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn, possible hoax.. Blnguyen 04:19, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn, hoax Ian13/talk 14:18, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete probable hoax, possible attack. Accurizer 17:42, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - hoax, flat out. --light darkness^(talk) 20:33, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Likely hoax. WP is not obliged to retain items whose veracity is difficult to verify. The onus is on the contributor(s) to observe WP:V, WP:CITE. ENCEPHALON 22:36, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.