Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star trak real time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is clear that the improvements made after the nomination and sole delete !vote demonstrate notability. I will procedurally open a RM discussion as follow-up. (non-admin closure) User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 17:14, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Star trak real time[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has several significant issues, and with no references, it is not possible to tell the extent to which it is based on original research. Additionally, the subject is of questionable notability.

Given this, it would seem preferable to delete the article and if sources for notability can be found/are produced in the future, the article can be recreated on the basis of these sources. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 22:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 22:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 22:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This would probably deserve a PROD. Seems promotional as well. Sungodtemple (talk) 23:16, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep on the basis of academic references like this and this and this. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:23, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article was improved. It now meets WP:GNG. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 13:47, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, article has been improved since nomination, and I've already removed some text that could have been seen to be promotional or unencyclopedic. NemesisAT (talk) 21:50, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To add to this, there appears to have been further press coverage but unfortunately, I haven't been able to recover any of it as the newspapers have removed their online articles. NemesisAT (talk) 22:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the added sources seem to establish notability. A consideration might be made for changing the article title to "Star Trak" per WP:COMMONNAME but that's outside the scope of this AfD. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 15:29, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep per academic coverage provided, and Rename to Star Trak. 👨x🐱 (talk) 17:29, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I also support a rename, do we need to wait until the closure of this AfD to do that? NemesisAT (talk) 17:50, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.