Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wreck Roleplaying Game

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:43, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wreck Roleplaying Game[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article is a non-notable book/game. The link in reference 1 "Kenneth Hite's Out of the Box column" appears to be dead, and I couldn't find significant coverage elsewhere. The book itself was issued as a limited print run and no further print runs are planned. However it is also available online. Having perused the book itself, it's around 30 pages in total, of which a fair amount is white space or lists of stats etc. Assuming the article is deleted, I will add the book's download website to the External Links at the page of the author, so those interested can refer to it directly rather than having a separate placeholder article on Wikipedia. Demiurge1000 (talk) 07:59, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Star Wreck. For that matter, Star Wreck: In the Pirkinning should also be merged and redirected into Star Wreck. Although I believe the game can stand alone if sources were dug up, I believe that since these are all one universe (first move, game based on movie, second movie), the article can be significantly cleaned up if they are merged together. Turlo Lomon (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:06, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge. It is a minor yet somewhat popular RPG. It appears reliable independent sources used to exist but have expired or whatever; hopefully some can be dug up. Merging it with Star Wreck would be awkward but perhaps the only solution.--Johnsemlak (talk) 08:57, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.