Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wars - The Queen's Gambit
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace. MBisanz talk 01:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Star Wars - The Queen's Gambit[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Star Wars - The Queen's Gambit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
An unnotable and unreferenced board game. After reading the article, it appears to be an original research game guide. Delete per WP:GAMEGUIDE and WP:N. Tavix (talk) 00:40, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral but no objection to deletion. I deprodded it because I thought it deserved discussion. I thought about taking it to AFD right then and there but instead I asked for comments on WikiProject Board and Table Games. The lack of discussion since Jan. 3 is telling. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 01:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This has been listed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Board and table games. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 01:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:NOTABILITY. Schuym1 (talk) 02:02, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for the same reason I prodded it: unreferenced gameguide for non-notable product. --EEMIV (talk) 04:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge a small and verifiable mention into Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace (the film it was based on). I don't think calling it nonnotable is warranted since Avalon Hill is a well-known games creator/distributor. Obviously game guide information needs to go, but a basic description and goal can be merged. - Mgm|(talk) 13:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Macgyver, no need for separate article, and no material to sustain it. As is, possible copyvio as it recreates the rules of the game. ThuranX (talk) 02:41, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.