Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Saga One: Beyond the Boundary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. czar 02:56, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Star Saga One: Beyond the Boundary[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An IP user created the page with some good sources. It was then redirected back to Star Saga. Bringing here, to assess notability and see if it can be a standalone article page on the first game in the series itself. Right cite (talk) 21:15, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Right cite (talk) 21:15, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I think there is enough here to meet the GNG for a standalone article. 2601:243:1C80:6740:DC2B:6DF7:CF88:4464 (talk) 21:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If anything, Star Saga should become a redirect or disambiguation page, as it fails the VG series requirements. This page, however, easily seems to pass GNG._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:35, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Both games get coverage, so can have two separate articles. This one is for the first game, the other can be renamed for the second, it listing information about it and why the sales were so bad they had to sell their company. Dream Focus 22:57, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 06:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but re-organize: this does seem to cover the same topic as Star Saga, and the two should be combined into one better article. I do see some coverage of the second game in the series article, and that should be re-written as its own spin-out, or as a short section at the end of the article about the first game. There might be two topics here, but not as written. Jontesta (talk) 20:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.