Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stan Taffel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:07, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stan Taffel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for non notable individual. Lacks independent coverage about him in reliable sources. Coverage is priamry, PR reproductions, listings, non reliable and minor mentions. Nothing good for gng. No significant roles in notable productions. Emmys won are regional. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:17, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:21, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:21, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:43, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 May 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I was hoping maybe the subject could pass via WP:BASIC, but, when I started digging into the sourcing, I found only passing mentions and single line quotes. He's an expert on Charlie Chaplin and the Golden Age of Hollywood, but, he's not passing WP:GNG nor WP:BASIC on my end. Missvain (talk) 20:37, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.